Hi team,
I've been exploring the newly released `/users/{id}/preferences` API endpoint and wanted to share some initial thoughts and feedback. The ability to directly manage user preferences via the API is a significant improvement and will greatly streamline our integration processes.
Positive Observations:
- Clear Naming Convention: The endpoint name is intuitive and follows RESTful principles.
- Comprehensive Fields: It appears to cover all the necessary preference fields we've discussed, including themes, notification settings, and language preferences.
- Status Codes: The use of standard HTTP status codes (200 OK, 201 Created, 400 Bad Request, 404 Not Found, etc.) is excellent and makes error handling straightforward.
I've tested a few scenarios, and it seems to work as expected. However, I have a couple of suggestions for enhancement:
Suggestions for Improvement:
- Batch Updates: Currently, it seems we can only update one preference at a time or all at once. It would be highly beneficial to support batch updates, allowing us to update a subset of preferences in a single request. This would reduce network overhead.
- Field Validation Feedback: While bad requests are handled, the error messages for invalid field values could be more specific. For instance, if a `theme` value is invalid, it would be helpful to know which of the allowed themes are valid directly in the error response.
- Rate Limiting Documentation: Could we get some clearer documentation on the rate limits for this endpoint? Understanding these limits will help prevent unexpected throttling.
Overall, this is a solid addition to our API. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and seeing any potential updates based on this feedback!
Thanks,
dev_ninja