MSDN Community

Your platform for technical Q&A and collaboration.

Answer to a Complex C# LINQ Query

Problem Description:

I'm struggling with a particularly tricky LINQ query in C#. I need to retrieve a list of products, but only those that have been sold in the last 30 days and belong to a category that has more than 50 items in stock. The data is structured across three tables: `Products`, `Sales`, and `Inventory`.

My Proposed Solution:

Here's the C# code snippet that I believe solves the problem. I've used multiple `Join` operations and a `Where` clause to filter the results.

var recentSalesProducts = from sale in dbContext.Sales join product in dbContext.Products on sale.ProductId equals product.Id join category in dbContext.Categories on product.CategoryId equals category.Id where sale.SaleDate >= DateTime.UtcNow.AddDays(-30) group product by new { product.Id, product.Name, product.Price, category.Name } into groupedProduct let categoryItemCount = dbContext.Inventory.Count(i => i.ProductId == groupedProduct.Key.Id) where categoryItemCount > 50 select new { Id = groupedProduct.Key.Id, Name = groupedProduct.Key.Name, Price = groupedProduct.Key.Price, CategoryName = groupedProduct.Key.Name, // Sum of sales quantities for this product in the last 30 days TotalSoldLast30Days = groupedProduct.Sum(g => g.SaleQuantity) }; // To get distinct products if needed, you could add .Distinct() after the select, // but the grouping should handle it if sale details are granular. var finalProductList = recentSalesProducts.ToList();

Explanation:

  1. We start by joining `Sales` with `Products` on `ProductId`.
  2. Then, we join the result with `Categories` on `CategoryId` to get category information.
  3. The `where` clause filters sales records to include only those within the last 30 days.
  4. We then group the results by product and category details to aggregate sales data.
  5. A `let` clause is used to count inventory items for each product. Note: this might be inefficient if `Inventory` is very large. A pre-joined count or a different approach might be better for performance.
  6. Finally, we filter based on `categoryItemCount` and project the desired properties, including the total quantity sold in the last 30 days.

Further Considerations:

  • Performance: The `let categoryItemCount` might be a bottleneck. Consider pre-calculating category counts or joining with inventory information earlier if possible.
  • Data Structure: Ensure your `SaleQuantity` property accurately reflects the quantity sold in each sale record.
  • Edge Cases: What happens if a product has no sales in the last 30 days but meets the category criteria? This query won't include it. If that's desired, a `left join` might be necessary.

Comments (3)

Great explanation, John! I had a similar problem and your query structure is very insightful. I especially liked the use of `let` for the inventory count, though I agree with your performance note.

Jane Smith
2 days ago

Thanks for sharing! I've noticed that joining `Categories` directly might be redundant if `Products` already contains `CategoryId`. You could potentially simplify the join chain.

Peter Jones
1 day ago

One small suggestion: For performance on large datasets, consider using `Any()` instead of `Count()` inside the `let` clause if you only need to check for existence of inventory above a certain threshold, or join the inventory table differently. Your code is clean though!

Alice Brown
1 hour ago

Add a Comment