Entity Framework Core vs. EF6
This document provides a detailed comparison between Entity Framework Core (EF Core) and the legacy Entity Framework 6 (EF6), helping you understand their differences, advantages, and use cases.
Introduction
Entity Framework (EF) is a popular Object-Relational Mapper (ORM) for .NET that enables developers to work with databases using .NET objects. Over time, EF has evolved, leading to two major versions:
- Entity Framework 6 (EF6): The last major release of the original EF framework, released in 2013.
- Entity Framework Core (EF Core): A complete rewrite and redesign of Entity Framework, focusing on extensibility, performance, and cross-platform support. It was first released in 2016.
Key Differences
While both frameworks serve the same core purpose, EF Core introduces significant architectural changes and new features. Here's a breakdown of the key differences:
| Feature | Entity Framework Core (EF Core) | Entity Framework 6 (EF6) |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Cross-platform (.NET Core, .NET Framework, Mono, etc.) | Primarily Windows (.NET Framework) |
| Performance | Generally faster due to architectural improvements and optimizations. | Solid performance, but can be slower than EF Core in some scenarios. |
| Extensibility | Highly extensible with a new interceptor model and a more modular design. | Extensible, but less modular than EF Core. |
| Querying | Improved LINQ translation, better support for complex queries. | Mature LINQ translation. |
| Database Providers | Supports a wide range of providers (SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, Oracle, Cosmos DB, etc.) via NuGet packages. | Primarily focused on SQL Server, with third-party providers available. |
| Migrations | More robust and flexible migration system. Supports automatic migrations and data seeding. | Supports migrations, but with a different workflow and fewer advanced features. |
| Logging | Integrated with the .NET Core logging infrastructure (Microsoft.Extensions.Logging). |
Uses its own logging mechanism. |
| Dependency Injection | Built with DI in mind, seamless integration with ASP.NET Core's DI container. | Not designed with DI as a core concept, requires manual setup. |
| Model Configuration | Supports configuration via Data Annotations and the Fluent API (OnModelCreating). |
Supports configuration via Data Annotations and the Fluent API (OnModelCreating). |
| Compiled Queries | No direct equivalent, but performance can be optimized through other means. | Supported. |
| Connection Resiliency | Built-in support for transient fault handling. | Requires separate NuGet packages for advanced resiliency. |
| Open Source | Fully open source on GitHub. | Initially not open source, later partially open sourced. |
When to Use EF Core
- New Projects: For all new .NET applications, especially those targeting cross-platform or using .NET Core.
- Performance-Critical Applications: EF Core's optimizations often provide better performance.
- Modern Web Applications (ASP.NET Core): Seamless integration with ASP.NET Core and its DI system.
- Cloud-Native Development: Supports modern cloud databases and deployment scenarios.
- Microservices: Its lightweight nature and extensibility make it suitable for microservice architectures.
When to Consider EF6
- Existing .NET Framework Applications: If you have a legacy application running on .NET Framework and upgrading to .NET Core is not feasible in the short term.
- Specific EF6-Only Features: While EF Core is catching up, there might be very niche features or behaviors in EF6 that are critical to your existing application logic.
- Complex ORM Scenarios with Extensive EF6 Tooling: If your team has deep expertise and extensive tooling built around EF6 that would be difficult to migrate.
Migration Considerations
Migrating from EF6 to EF Core can range from straightforward to complex, depending on your application's size, dependencies, and use of specific EF6 features. It's generally recommended to plan this migration carefully, especially for larger, more established projects.
Code Examples
EF Core - Basic Usage
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
public class BloggingContextCore : DbContext
{
public DbSet<BlogCore> Blogs { get; set; }
public DbSet<PostCore> Posts { get; set; }
protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder optionsBuilder)
{
optionsBuilder.UseSqlServer("Server=(localdb)\\mssqllocaldb;Database=EFCoreDemo;Trusted_Connection=True;");
}
}
public class BlogCore
{
public int BlogId { get; set; }
public string Url { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<PostCore> Posts { get; set; }
}
public class PostCore
{
public int PostId { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public string Content { get; set; }
public int BlogId { get; set; }
public virtual BlogCore Blog { get; set; }
}
EF6 - Basic Usage
using System.Data.Entity;
public class BloggingContextEF6 : DbContext
{
public DbSet<BlogEF6> Blogs { get; set; }
public DbSet<PostEF6> Posts { get; set; }
public BloggingContextEF6() : base("name=BloggingContextEF6")
{
}
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
// EF6 Configuration can go here
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
}
}
public class BlogEF6
{
public int BlogId { get; set; }
public string Url { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<PostEF6> Posts { get; set; }
}
public class PostEF6
{
public int PostId { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public string Content { get; set; }
public int BlogId { get; set; }
public virtual BlogEF6 Blog { get; set; }
}
Note: The syntax for configuration and context setup differs between EF Core and EF6. EF Core leverages the newer .NET Core configuration patterns and dependency injection.
Conclusion
Entity Framework Core represents the future of data access with .NET. Its cross-platform capabilities, performance enhancements, and modern design make it the recommended choice for new development. EF6 remains a viable option for existing .NET Framework applications, but migration to EF Core should be a strategic consideration for long-term maintainability and access to the latest features.
For detailed migration guides and advanced features, please refer to the official Microsoft documentation for each framework.